|
||||||
|
|
|
State House Passes Health Insurance and Teacher Bills
By David Darman on Thursday, June 5, 2003.
In addition to setting up a conference committee to work out a budget with the Senate today, the House also passed a controversial bill that would change the rules for selling health insurance to small groups. And the House voted to make it easier for local school boards to fire poorly performing teachers. NHPR?s David Darman has more. Proponents of Senate Bill 110 were defensive on the House Floor, after several members had criticized the bill during debate. Commerce Committee Chairman John Hunt told the House that SB110 was good for small businesses, because it answered the chief complaint of most health insurance consumers. But the promised benefits of SB 110 did little to stem the doubts of several speakers against the bill. Representative Mark Brady of Jefferson used his first speech to the House to condemn the concept that SB 110 would foster competition, by bringing more insurance companies into the state. Several speakers derided medical underwriting, for the latitude it would allow companies to price insurance. They warned that construction or restaurant workers would pay more, because their jobs could be considered ?dangerous occupations?. And they balked at the concept that insurance companies would be able to charge higher rates for people who had chronic conditions, like diabetes. The critics were also dissatisfied with the bill for allowing companies to charge residents of the Seacoast or North Country higher rates, just because of where they lived. Commerce Committee chairman Hunt took strong exception to this last charge. Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield is the only major insurance carrier in northern New Hampshire. The debate concerning a bill that would streamline the procedure to fire poorly performing teachers also stirred emotions on both sides of the issue. Representative Jeffrey Carter of Manchester rose in favor of SB76, saying it took too long to get rid of bad teachers under the current system of removal. But critics of SB76 said the bill undercut local communities, because many allow teachers who want to appeal dismissal the option of binding arbitration. Under arbitration, an independent party judges the merits of a case, rather than bringing the case into a court of law. Representative Kathleen Souza of Manchester said the bill would allow teachers to appeal a dismissal a different way, but she doubted it would be worth much. SB 76 passed the House by 92 votes. The House has finished its consideration of Senate Bills for this session. But House and Senate members will continue to be busy for weeks to come. Both need to work out final versions of dozens of bills in committees of conference. Post a comment
|
Support FromHighlights |