Most Active Stories
- Former UNH Student Goes It Alone In Criminal Court, Wins 'Not Guilty' Verdict
- Update: Speaker Demands Apology For Abortion Remark During Debate Over Fourth Graders' Bird Bill
- Spring Book Picks 2015
- Report: Former Chief Justice Banned From UNH Law's Rudman Center
- After Six Generations, Making Sure The Family Farm Stays A Farm Forever
Tue April 9, 2013
ExxonMobil Found Liable In N.H. Pollution Trial
A jury in New Hampshire has ruled that Exxon-Mobile must pay the state $236 million dollars to help clean groundwater contaminated with a gasoline additive known as MTBE. But the monetary award is by no means a done deal.
In a little state like New Hampshire, $236 million is nothing to sneeze at.
Delaney: This is the largest verdict obtained by the state of New Hampshire in the history of the state.
That’s attorney General Mike Delaney announcing the verdict to reporters.
He says it took ten years to bring it to trial, and three months of hearings to get through all the evidence.
Delaney: but it took the jury approximately two hours to hold Exxon responsible for contaminating the state’s groundwater.
Oil companies started adding low levels of MTBE to gas in 1979 to replace lead. Its use was ramped up in the nineties because it reduces smog and gas makers were trying to comply with the Clean Air Act. It was sold in gas stations in places were poor air quality was a problem: from coastal New England to California and lots of places in between.
But when it became clear that the chemical could seep out of storage tanks and contaminate ground water, states and water suppliers started to sue. New Hampshire’s lead attorney in the case, Jessica Grant, says many in the industry knew of the risks posed by MTBE.
Grant: Exxon had done a fifteen month, companywide study, where their own environmental engineers had concluded that the environmental risks associated with MTBE were so great that it should not be used on a blanket basis in the United States.
As the lawsuits rolled in many oil companies settled out of court, including most in New Hampshire. The state has already accrued $136 million in settlements from Shell, Citgo, Irving, Hess, and Conoco Phillips among others.
But Exxon stood fast.
The company’s attorney in the New Hampshire trial, Jim Quinn explains, that despite their loss this week, he still believes they’ve got a good case.
Quinn: MTBE worked exactly as it was supposed to. The government essentially put us into a position that MTBE had to be put into the gasoline, we had no other choice.
Exxon argues it was MTBE or nothing. And since the EPA approved MTBE to clean up the nation’s smog problem, they say it’s the feds who should be liable for damages.
Jeffrey Rachlinsky is a law professor at Cornell who has been following the case. He says the problem is states can’t sue Federal Government over this.
Rachlinsky: the states really don’t have the capacity to sue the federal government in this way, there’s essentially sovereign immunity by the federal government for this sort of a statute.
Exxon is fighting similar cases in other states. In Maryland there were two cases in which the plaintiffs were awarded $1.65 billion dollars. But in February another Maryland court threw those rulings out.
However, one an MTBE case has made it to the federal level so far. A District court in New York ruled against Exxon. The company is appealing that ruling, and says it will appeal the New Hampshire decision as well.
All Things Considered