Most Active Stories
- Former UNH Student Goes It Alone In Criminal Court, Wins 'Not Guilty' Verdict
- Update: Speaker Demands Apology For Abortion Remark During Debate Over Fourth Graders' Bird Bill
- Update: N.H. AG Says Murder-Suicide Likely In Deaths Of Bedford Mother, Two Children
- Report: Former Chief Justice Banned From UNH Law's Rudman Center
- Why Human Feeding Can Hurt Deer
Wed February 19, 2014
House Votes 231-97 To Prohibit Sex Offender Restrictions
Twelve towns have passed ordinances to limit where sex offenders can live -- barring offenders from living near schools, or child-care centers.
But law enforcement oppose such bans. Renny Cushing of Hampton, a Democrat, told House colleagues that police know restrictions make monitoring offenders harder.
"The chiefs of police do not want to have a situation where you take away one of the tools they have which is to track where sex offenders are. And that’s also why the coalition against sexual and domestic violence is in support of this legislation."
The House has twice voted to ban such ordinances but the prohibition has never won support in the Senate.
Two courts have struck down local anti-sex offender ordinances.
In 2009 a judge in Dover ruled that the city had never shown a substantial relationship between its policy and protecting children.
In 2012 a Merrimack county judge ruled similarly in a challenge to an ordinance in Franklin.