Most Active Stories
- A Huge, New Ski Resort At The Balsams?
- Rail Study Group Expects 3,000 Riders Daily Between Manchester and Boston
- N.H. Senate Approves Medicaid Expansion Proposal
- Miss. Man Thought Dead, Comes Back To Life On Embalming Table
- With Escalating Heroin Epidemic In Portsmouth, City's Reputation Could Be On The Line
13.7: Cosmos And Culture
Sat January 26, 2013
Seeing U.S. Laboratory Chimpanzees For Who They Are
Originally published on Mon January 28, 2013 8:59 am
By now, you probably know that the National Institutes of Health last week announced its plans to retire to sanctuaries hundreds of chimpanzees used for research, including invasive biomedical research. The story was big news nationally, including here at NPR, and resulted also in posts by animal advocacy groups such as PETA. (I've also written about our nation's lab chimpanzees before at 13.7, most recently here.)
Even without intending any indifference or casual attitude, it can be natural for us to refer to these primates in the aggregate. I just did that, with my "hundreds of chimpanzees" in the paragraph above.
But these animals are not anonymous lab subjects. Each chimpanzee, those owned by NIH and those available for experimentation elsewhere, is a distinct individual who thinks and feels. Take a look at Lori Gruen's new website "The Last 1000," and read the names. If you can, read them slowly, one by one, and notice the birthdates too. Start with Abby and Abe, and finish with Zoey and Zort. And realize how many of them are still nameless to us.
A green-colored name means that that chimpanzee has already gone to sanctuary. Gruen's goal? A very green website.
Keep up with Barbara on Twitter: @bjkingape